Review Of Im Nobody! Who Are You?

Review Of Im Nobody! Who Are You? Thesis Statement: Emily Dickinson poem, Im Nobody! Who Are You?, is successful on influencing readers that the best ideas can come from nothing. Introduction: I chose this as one of the famous poets known poem, which is found at Chapter 10.1, entitled: The Speaker (Persona) in a Poem. It can also be found from Thomas H. Johnsons (1960) Book of Complete Poems as its 288th entry: Im Nobody! Who are you? Are you- Nobody-Too? Then theres a pair of us! Dont tell! theyd advertise, you know. - How dreary-to be- Somebody! How public-like a frog- To tell ones name- the livelong June- To an admiring bog! What about the poems form, language, content, or other dimension do you find engaging?: I find engaging its genre of lyrical form, English language using informal diction and bearing a very good rhyme scheme (o sound in lines 1 and 2 with g in 6 and 8) with 2 stanzas. The theme shows how one can find the identity of self and gather the best ideas can come from only doing nothing. It uses the simile and metaphor figure of speeches, because it was able to compare or equate unlike things in similarity (Nobody vs Famous persons) and used the word like in line 6 in the second stanza. Moreover, to dissect the poem, when the word they was mentioned in line 4, wherein the poet was pertaining to famous people or any person situated in high levels the of society (Essay on Emily dickinson i am nobody! who are you? para. 1). With a very short content of only 8 lines, Dickinson was able to quickly reach out to others who would want to have the same privacy she experienced and also gain fruitful o utcomes from this choice. Doing this is actually not seen as usual in famous persons or high level situated bodies. How does the poems use of language compare to that of everyday speech?: I can say that in terms of both modern and classic writing on poetry, it still uses informal diction, though there certainly will be a difference in the use of words if one can write it today. To site a modern view on Dickinsons way of writing in the Im Nobody! Who Are You? poem, Jessica Writes (2007) wrote an online essay saying that, it is evident here that she is referring to a friend that she had relationships kept in private, but were foretold mostly by her corresponding letters. Indeed she is successful in her field. Wherein, she was productive during times she was alone, nursing the gardens inside their yard, writing poetry and reading. Since, she preferred to be named as an anonymous poet to her poems; it shows a personal assessment as A Nobody in the society, being a direct reflection of ideals as a non-conformist to the society. Its psychological nature are greatly affecting to people and objects geared towards seeing themselves in this way in life. With todays social pressures, even the smallest poem can help. Back in the old days, wherein classic literature are given birth to, renaissance and revolutions are greatly affected with writers who seek for a new beginning and freedom thru their writing skills. How do the differences and/or similarities between speech and poetic form affect your experience of the poem?: Domhnall Mitchell (2000), a very good critic of literature, mentioned in his book, that the poem Im Nobody! Who Are You? is a form of confessional poetry. Wherein, I agree with this thought. That is why it uses the simile and metaphor figure of speeches, because it was able to compare or equate unlike things in similarity, which is the Dickinson and akin others being the Nobody type of persons judged against the Famous type of persons (who would not likely to favor practices of a Nobody.) At first, a reader would have taught that Dickinson was talking about herself, but there is a quick turn of mood when the poem becomes about the reader. I find this interesting. This can be seen after the 1 line was said, which is a statement about Dickinsons poetic self, and then there is a following string of questions pertaining to the readers own selves. Lastly, the poems 2 immediate co ncerns are: the readers asking who we are, as well as the how is the relationship existing between the reader and the poet (pp. 157-158). Do these differences and/or similarities influence how you think or feel about the subject matter of the poem?: In terms of familiarity, I can say that this poem is reflective of Dickinsons life and not the persons she sites in her poem. It is more personal in nature. For instance, Arthur Versluis (2001), another very good critic of literature in history, mentioned the opinion of John Cody, in his own book, that her works are pronouncing of her madness as a result. That is why the poem, Im Nobody! Who Are You?, has certain negativity touch on it. It was also quoted, one will inevitably misunderstand and trivialize much of Emily Dickinsons life and poetry if one fails to grasp the full intensity of her suffering and the magnitude of her collapse. For this reason let me state at the onset my thesis that the crisis Emily Dickinson suffered following the marriage of her brother was a psychosis (p. 175). Conclusion: Yes, I agree that the best ideas can come from nothing. You can occupy your time with writing poetries like what Emily Dickinson is known for during her time. Yet, even if one decides a secluded life, society will hunt. Dickinsons writes in such a way that she dictates and forces the readers mind to think the same and view society like her opinion. The advantage I can see here is that it is leading to a self-evaluation and growth in uniqueness as individuals. On the other hand, a disadvantage of her way of writing (as well as thinking) is that it fails to show the right personality for an individual. When, maturity takes place, when one knows his or her purpose in life, then the best ideas can come in, one can make fruitful outcomes and one can reach success. Even the quietest moments or disturbing scenes takes self-confidence and trust, a parallel thought to both being a Nobody and a Famous person.

Great Gatsby Chapter 9 notes

Fitzgerald draws his novel to its conclusion. This chapter allows him to make his final comment on the corrupt and destructive side of the American Dream. On one level it could be said that Gatsby represents the success story of the American Dream – the epitome of the stereotypical ascent from ‘rags to riches'. He drives his own fortune and prosperity acquiring great wealth and material possessions; but , ultimately, his dream fails anyway. Fitzgerald makes it abundantly clear just how distorted the collective vision of society had become with regard to the accumulation of wealth and the influence of mass media – represented by the eyes of T J Eckleburg. Such materialistic goals had overtaken the more altruistic and virtuous pursuits inherent in the original interpretation of the American Dream. In this chapter the reader senses Nick's great sense of despair, disillusionment and disgust. He is appalled by the behaviour he encounters in his preparation for Gatsby's funeral: ‘I found myself on Gatsby's side and alone.' After all the parties he had thrown for a countless trail of guests who paraded through his house ‘Nobody came.' The reader has now experienced Nick's journey, his voyage – note the sea imagery to which he refers in the final lines of the novel. It is interesting to note just how much Nick has matured as a result of his experiences: ‘†¦as he lay in his house and didn't move or breathe or speak, hour upon hour, it grew upon me that I was responsible, because no one else was interested – interested, I mean, with that intense personal interest to which everyone has some vague right at the end.' So, it is Nick who shoulders the final responsibility for Gatsby. Nick begins the chapter commenting on the impact of these events – remember he is writing from a retrospective stance two years later: ‘After two years I remember the rest of that day, and that night and the next day, only as an endless drill of police and photographers and newspaper men in and out of Gatsby's front door.' These seem to be the only people interested – the media. They are not interested in the man Gatsby, but rather the fabrication of the man, the lies and the gossip which go hand in hand with his own self-constructed image. Essentially the media contributes to the corruption of the American Dream. Nick ‘wanted to get somebody for him'. He feels loyal and protective towards Gatsby and so begins an avid search to do just this. But he tells us ‘no one arrived except more police and photographers and newspaper men.' Perhaps, one need look no further than at the history of the original image fabricators, the dream creators of Hollywood to learn of the pitiful and lonely existences of their more fragile stars. Strip away the veneer of glamour and wealth and all that really prevails is the very stark and harsh Valley of Ashes. All of this reinforces Nick's loyalty: ‘I began to have a feeling of defiance, of scornful solidarity between Gatsby and me against them all.' Nick begins to catalogue the callousness of the people who cannot hide their indifference to Gatsby's death. Wolfsheim declares ‘I cannot come down now as I am tied up in some very important business and cannot get mixed up in this thing now.' A pathetic euphemism for really saying he cannot be bothered – it's not that important. Next, there is Klipspringer who claims ‘Well, I certainly try†¦' when asked to attend the funeral but may be unable to because of ‘a sort of picnic'. However, he does get to the heart of the matter, ‘What I called about was a pair of shoes I left there†¦' Nick ‘felt a certain shame for Gatsby.' Fitzgerald now chooses this moment to reveal another aspect of Gatsby's past – his estranged father: ‘He came out to see me two years ago and bought me the house I live in now.' Gatsby has been generous with his money. It is Gatsby's father who reveals the sense of purpose and indeed the dreamer in Gatsby from his diary: ‘Rise from bed 6.00 AM Dumbbell exercise and wall-scaling†¦' He even had a list of endearing ‘General Resolves' which do imbue him with an innocence and a sincerity that enhances the reader's opinion of him, sadly after his death: ‘No more smokeing or chewing Read one improving book or magazine per week Save $5.00 (crossed out) $3.00 per week Be better to parents' The misspelling of ‘smoking' is deliberate by the way. Three people attend the funeral – Mr Gatz, Nick and Owl Eyes. Owl eyes is the only party guest who shows up. He is shocked to witness the absence of so many; ‘Why, my God! They used to go there by the hundreds.' It is interesting to note, bearing in mind the references to blindness that we encounter throughout the novel, that Owl eyes removes his spectacles before declaring the reality and moral truth of Gatsby's situation: ‘The poor son- of -a-bitch.' The blindness comes from within as can be seen from most of Fitzgerald's characters. Nick comments, ‘I see now that this has been a story of the West, after all – Tom and Gatsby, Daisy and Jordan and I, were all Westerners, and perhaps we possessed some deficiency in common which made us subtly unadaptable to Eastern life.' You will remember from ‘Death of a Salesman' that there is a similar East – West divide. Biff favours the freedom and happiness in the West whereas Willy relentlessly pursues the capitalist Eastern way of life – again exposing the corrupt nature of the American Dream. Nick has matured enough to see through the ‘racy, adventurous ffeel' of the East and its ‘enchanted metropolitan twilight' – he realises that beneath all the glamorous, glittering veneer there are ‘spasms of bleak dust which drift endlessly over it†¦' just like the ‘fowl dust' which ‘floated in the wake of his (Gatsby's) dreams'. The East represents capitalism and consumerism and indeed corruption of American society. The West was presumably still relatively innocent rating homespun values and the happiness of the individual. Nick is able to see this – but he is the only character in the novel who does. The East has ‘a quality of distortion'. Again, Fitzgerald juxtaposes the recurring adjectives, ‘grotesque' and ‘fantastic', once more alluding to the impossible dream with reality: ‘West Egg, especially, still figures in my more fantastic dreams†¦a hundred houses, at once conventional and grotesque, crouching under a sullen, over-hanging sky and lustreless moon.' There is no romantic presentation of this location for Nick – the place is given an eerie, dismal atmosphere, where the houses are personified as shrinking away from this depressing, all-consuming locale. Notably it is here Nick talks about the anonymous woman in white whom I have pointed out before: ‘†¦four solemn men in dress suits are walking along the sidewalk with a stretcher on which lies a drunken woman in a white evening dress. Her hand, which dangles over the side, sparkles cold with jewels. Gravely the men turn in at a house – the wrong house. But no one knows the woman's name, and no one cares.' This is a very sinister dream in which Nick envisions a woman in white – this woman could represent Daisy or Jordan or even one of the female guests at Gatsby's party. It does not really matter, for Fitzgerald she represents the anonymity and lack of substance of the typical 1920s female. She is suppressed by the superiority of her male counterpart who uses her to satisfy and fulfil sexual desire. The fact that the woman is drunk and therefore lacks control reinforces the status of women is such a society which has itself lost sight and control of any kind of moral fibre. Her hand ‘sparkles cold with jewels' suggesting the empty, shallow pursuit of such material possessions. The fact that the men drop her off at the wrong house and ‘no one cares' really captures the essence of something Daisy says earlier in reference to her daughter – ‘I hope she'll be a fool – that's the best thing a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool.' On first reading this seems like another very whimsical, even stupid and callous statement from Daisy but it is this very passage about Nick's nightmare that gives her comment weight and meaning and, perhaps, it's the most insightful thing she says in the entire novel. ‘They were careless people, Tom and Daisy – they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made†¦' This really contains the essence of Nick's loathing of such people. This triggers the memory of something he says at the beginning of the novel when he is about to relate his story to the reader: ‘When I came back from the East last autumn I felt that I wanted to be in uniform and at a sort of moral attention for ever; I wanted no more riotous excursions with privileged glimpses into the human heart.' We remember him talking about ‘the distinguished secret society to which she and Tom belonged.' A society which had such a callous disregard for human life; this can be seen by their reactions to the deaths of Gatsby and Myrtle – both of which are really perpetuated by Tom and Daisy respectively. They disappear – drifting off leaving chaos behind undoubtedly to begin a life elsewhere. The drifting which permeates the novel points towards the loss of moral and spiritual stability which must come from the core of the individual. Tom and Daisy can do this because they never really become attached to anything or anyone – they are indeed ‘careless' and their wealth allows them a certain freedom, an escape from reality. Finally Nick sums up the essence of the original American Dream: ‘And as the moon rose higher the inessential houses began to melt away until gradually I became aware of the old island here that flowered once for Dutch sailors' eyes – a fresh, green breast of the new world. Its vanished trees, the trees that had made way for Gatsby's house, had once pandered in whispers to the last and greatest of all human dreams; for a transitory enchanted moment man must have held his breath in the presence of this continent, compelled into an aesthetic contemplation he neither understood nor desired, face to face for the last time in history with something commensurate to his capacity for wonder.' This is a brilliant piece of description from Fitzgerald and quite poignantly encapsulates the real essence of the American Dream. Yet, it could not be sustained. The land became manipulated and exploited for human profit. But for the 17th century Dutch sailors it was, in those first moments, the ultimate land of growth, beauty and enchantment – ‘fresh, green breast of the new world'. It is clear that this is why Nick refers to Gatsby as ‘great' – †¦I thought of Gatsby's wonder when he first picked out the green light at the end of Daisy's dock.' This was what Nick admired – ‘his capacity for wonder' ‘He had come a long way to this blue lawn, and his dream must have seemed so close that he could hardly fail to grasp it. He did not know that it was already behind him, somewhere back in that vast obscurity beyond the city, where the dark fields of the republic rolled on under the night.' This is again referring to Gatsby's refusal to admit that his past could not be relived, or recaptured, just like his tenacious belief in the dream. The image of darkness and the attendant image of blindness is often used to foreshadow the inevitable failure of Gatsby's dream. Yet ‘Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgiastic future that year by yea recedes before us.' The green light here symbolises the dreams and hopes of society ‘It eluded us then, but that's no matter – tomorrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms farther†¦And one fine morning -‘ Nick refers here to the dreamer in all of us. He conveys the human need to dream, to be inspired, to be challenged. Yet, he knows it's important to be able to draw a line between the dream and reality – something Gatsby could never do. ‘So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.' We are all inextricably linked with our pasts – the past shapes the future. We know this obviously from history. Gatsby insisted on living in the past – his past with Daisy. Daisy could not isolate him from his past; he remained socially unworthy of her. Can any of us really escape the past. America itself struggled to shake off her more rigid European connections before the declaration of independence. Furthermore, the American Dream has become part of its past – a part of American history which no longer exists in the same way as it did then. The dream is impossible and this is what makes Gatsby's plight so tragic.

What Is the Difference Between First and Second Generation Immigrant

There is no universal consensus on whether to use first-generation or second-generation to describe an immigrant. The best advice on generational designations is to tread carefully and realize that the terminology is not precise and often ambiguous. As a general rule, use the governments terminology for that countrys immigration terminology. According to the United States Census Bureau, the first generation is the first family member to gain citizenship in the country or permanent residency. First Generation Definitions There are the two possible meanings  of the adjective first-generation, according to the Websters New World Dictionary. First-generation can refer to an immigrant, a foreign-born resident who has relocated and become a citizen, or permanent resident in a new country. Or first-generation could refer to a person who is the first in his or her family to be a naturally born citizen in a country of relocation. The U.S. government generally accepts the definition that the  first member of a family  who acquires citizenship or permanent residence qualifies as the family’s first generation. Birth in the United States is not a requirement. The first-generation refers to those immigrants who were born in another country and have become citizens and residents in a second country after relocation.   Some demographers and sociologists insist that a person cannot be a first-generation immigrant unless that person was born in the country of relocation. Second-Generation Terminology According to immigration activists, second-generation means an individual who was naturally born in the relocated country to one or more parents who were born elsewhere and are not U.S. citizens living abroad. Others maintain that second-generation means the second generation of offspring born in a country. As waves of immigrants migrate to the U.S., the numbers of second-generation Americans, defined by the U.S. Census Bureau as those individuals who have at least one foreign-born parent, are growing rapidly. It is expected that by 2050, the total percentage of immigrants will comprise 19 percent of the countrys total population, and that 18 percent of that total will be made of children born in the U.S of at least one foreign-born parent. In studies by the Pew Research Center, second-generation Americans tend to advance more quickly socially and economically than the first-generation pioneers who preceded them. Several studies have shown that by the second generation,  most immigrant families have fully assimilated into American society. Half-Generation Designation Some demographers and social scientists use half-generation designations.  Sociologists  coined the term 1.5 generation, or 1.5G, to refer to people who immigrate to a new country before or during their early teens. The immigrants earn the label the 1.5 generation because they bring with them characteristics from their home country but continue their assimilation and socialization in the new country, thus being halfway between the first generation and the second generation. But there is also the so-called 1.75 generation, or children who arrived in the U.S in their early years (before age 5) and are quickly adapting and absorbing the new environment; they behave mostly like second generations kids, who were born in U.S territory. Another term, 2.5 generation, could refer to an immigrant with one U.S.-born parent and one foreign-born parent. And a third generation person is one who has at least one grandparent born in a foreign country.

Applied Behavior Analysis Free Essay Example, 1500 words

Reinforce is a consequence that leads to an increase in frequency of behavior and target behavior. They are two type of reinforcement; positive and negative. (Bos money also is generally reinforcing. If a teacher who has attend to a child’s temper tantrums begins to ignore the temper tantrums behavior; however, if the teacher continuous to ignore the tantrum and there are other reinforce that follow the tantrum, like peer attention the tantrum should decrease in frequency. Negative reinforcement means taking away something unpleasant if a specific behavior exhibited. A command use in schools is the completion of work assignments to avoid staying after schools. If a teacher scowls at student until the student works, removing the scowl is negative reinforcement. We will write a custom essay sample on Applied Behavior Analysis or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now It is very important, to understand that actually determine if a stimulus is reinforcing only after it has been administered contingent on the appearance of a desired behavior. The relationship between a behavior and consequences is called contingency. Contingencies can operate continuously (the consequence follows every occurrence of the target behavior). Punishment Punishment is the removal of stimulus that decreases inappropriate behavior. Punishment should be used to stop behaviors that are harmful to the child or others. Student should be told ahead of time what the consequence (punishment) for exhibiting the behavior will be. When the undesirable behavior occurs, the punishment should be delivered as soon as inappropriate behavior is initiated. Unfortunately, punishment does not ensure that the desirable will occur. For example, a student who is punished for talking in class might stop talking but may not attend to his/her studies for the reminder of the day. Many significant argument against the use of punishment, is ineffective of the long run, provide little information about what to do, fear of punishment often leads to escape behavior In time out, the child denied the opportunity to participate in positive reinforcement for a specified period of time. Shaping Shaping involves gradually changing the existing inappropriate behavior into the behavior that is desired.